Message from JavaScript discussions

May 2017

— C:

#include <stdio.h>
#include <time.h>

int num () {
 return 4;
}

int main () {
 int n = 1000000;
 clock_t start = clock();

 while(n > 0) {
  num();
  n--;
 }

 clock_t diff = clock() - start;

 int ms = diff * 1000 / CLOCKS_PER_SEC;
 printf("runtime: %dms", ms);
}

Message permanent page

—

JavaScript:

"use strict";

function num () {
 return 4;
}

let n = 1000000;

console.time("runtime");

while (n > 0) {
 num();
 n--;
}

console.timeEnd("runtime");

—

$ gcc test.c -o test
$ ./test
runtime: 2ms
$ node test.js
runtime: 1.122ms

— Obviously not the best way to test performance

— But gives you an idea at least

— Yeah!

— Depends eh

— Usually these things just build a string and eval it

— Nope

— Not This one

— Building a string is cheap af obfuscation

— How did you obfuscate that?