Message from JavaScript discussions

April 2017

— But STILL, unary negation of an object could still throw imo


Theres lots of context-specific type-specific things js *should* do, but thats why we have typescript

— I guess

— Js has a LOT of little quirks like this

— Stuff that just doesn't make sense

— I still don't have a compile-step in my workflow

— Maybe I should


{} - [];

— XD

— From the wat talk?

— Is that in there? I was just thinking about it

— Ye