Message from JavaScript discussions

October 2018

— When I was asked this question I mean, at first I thought "okay '5' might coerce to number 5, and it could be 5 milliseconds from unix epoch" which is definitely not in April 2001

Message permanent page


They could have easily created WHATWG as an addendum to add all their new features / pointless BS, but wanted control over it all

— Oh please no

— Don't want "Works best on IE6" bs all over again

— That was only ever a problem because a certain WHATWG member (MS) thought they were too cool for the W3C spec in the first place

Message permanent page

— They took control away from the standards org so they could turn the development of the standard into a profit driven enterprise

Message permanent page

— Which is exactly the same thing Google is doing with Chrome these days

— Exactly

— And then, surprise surprise, undocumented chrome feature suddenly appears in WHATWG spec with not a word spoken about it

Message permanent page


— That happens often

— It’s the opposite of how a spec should work