Message from JavaScript discussions

June 2018

— One of these are gonna be the next step in type systems I think


Strong okay, whatever. this is a stupid thing, high level language should be dynamic, imo. im not against low-level, but tring to mix them.. bad idea!

— Strong types are very highlevel

— Especially those in Haskell

— And functional / logic languages

— You can implement any type in dynamic language, that's why any "strong" thing compiles to javascript

— You can implement any type in a strong language as well

— Sure, but it will cost you life probably) i mean, it's much harder to describe data structures there, hard to change them etc.

Message permanent page

— Nope

— None of this is true

— Maybe. but it's a holywar. we need some limited cases to battle, some example cases, etc.

— The fact, that one variable name may be reused multiple times.. removes clutter and makes code more clean and readable

Message permanent page